Taxonomy of Sweet Snack Food Names

The names of snack foods are tough to rank in an unbiased way. Our perceptions of snack food names are deeply influenced by emotional connections to the products formed at an early age.

  • Jell-O
  • Oreo
  • Cracker Jack
  • Moon Pie
  • Pop Tarts
  • Fiddle Faddle
  • Fig Newtons
  • Nutter Butter
  • Twinkies
  • Cool Whip
  • Ding Dongs
  • Hobnobs
  • Pinwheels
  • Sweetie Pie
  • Spotted Dick
  • Chips Ahoy!
  • Cameo
  • Cloud Nine
  • Grasshoppers
  • Honey Maid
  • Little Schoolboy
  • Ring Dings
  • Sno Ball
  • Nilla Vanilla Wafers
  • Hit
  • Krispy Kreme
  • Mystic Mints
  • Barnum's Animals
  • Pepperidge Farm
  • Suzy Q's
  • Zebra Cakes
  • Zoot Fruits
  • Animal Crackers
  • Biscos
  • Bunny Biscuits
  • Cafe Creams
  • SnackWell's
  • Teddy Grahams
  • Mallomars
  • Peak Frean
  • Ruggers Wafers
  • Sandies
  • Screaming Yellow Zonkers
  • Famous Amos
  • Ginger Snaps
  • Kozy Shack
  • Mother's
  • Poppycock
  • Tastykake
  • Boulder Brownies
  • Britannia
  • Hostess
  • Stella D'oro
  • Vienna Fingers
  • ChipsChoc
  • Cookie Stix
  • Cup O' Jelly
  • Fruit By The Foot
  • Pecanz
  • Chewly
  • Chippy Chips
  • Crispin
  • Grandma's
  • Lucky Rolls
  • Pecan Passion
  • Pop'ems
  • Snackin' Grahams
  • Little Debbie
  • Lorna Doone
  • E.L. Fudge
  • Marshmallow Twirls
  • Mini Butter Puff
  • Peanut Puff
  • Soft Batch
  • Sugar Wafers
  • Toaster Pastries
  • Wafer Rolls
  • Fruitsations
  • Otis Spunkmeyer
  • Munch'ems
  • My*T*Fine
  • Hydrox
  • Droxies

Levels of Engagement: These eight levels (y-axis levels from minus 2 to plus 5) represent the amount of material (meaning, stories, associations, imagery, multiple layers) in a name the audience has to play with and personalize – and how "engaged" they are by a name. Names in the minus 2 level are the least engaging, and likely to be quickly forgotten; the higher the number the better, with level 5 being the best.

Functional Names: The lowest common denominator of names, usually either named after a person, purely descriptive of what the company or product does, or a pre- or suffixed reference to functionality. (Infoseek, LookSmart)

Invented Names: "Invented" as in a made-up name (Acquient, Agilent, Alliant, Google) or a non-English name that is not widely known.

Experiential Names: A direct connection to something real, a part of direct human experience. Usually literal in nature, but presented with a touch of imagination. (Netscape, Palm Pilot)

Evocative Names: These names are designed to evoke the positioning of a company or product rather than the goods and services or the experience of those goods and services. Removed from direct experience, but relevant – evoking memories, stories, and many levels of association. (Virgin, Apple, Cracker Jack)

We encourage you to print this out and move names around, and see if you think they should be classified differently. It's an exercise that will get you thinking about the names in your own industry. (Here is a blank taxonomy chart you can print out.)

The first thing we do at the beginning of any naming or branding project is to thoroughly analyze the names and messaging of the competition in your business sector, and plot those names on a taxonomy chart like this one. This document is very helpful for everyone involved in the naming project to see the competitive reality and understand what types of names are overused and where we have to go to separate from the pack.

Toothpaste Name Taxonomy